Donate | Join/Renew | Print Page | Contact Us | Report Abuse | Sign In
Virtual Psychonomics 2020 Program
 

 

 

 

 

#psynom20




2020 Program Keynote Address
Symposia
Invited
Special Events
Affiliate Meetings

2020 Registration
Family Care Grants
Mobile App

Exhibitors and Sponsors
Press and Media

2020 Program Committee
Future Meetings
Past Meetings

Special Coverage

The Contribution of Articulatory Gestures and Orthography to Speech Processing: Evidence from Novel Word Learning (31)

Chotiga Pattamadilok and Pauline Welby (Aix-Marseille University), Michael Tyler (Western Sydney University)

Summary by Brett Myers, Digital Content Associate Editor

This recap is part of a special series of session summaries from the Psychonomic Society's 61st Annual Meeting. To read the rest of the series, click here.


When Words Speak Louder Than Actions

Chotiga Pattamadilok discusses her recent research with Pauline Welby and Michael Tyler regarding visual cues that contribute to speech processing.

From an early age, we learn to associate speech sounds with articulatory gestures and orthographic symbols. Pattamadilok points out that articulatory gestures are associated with early stages of speech perception (according to the motor theory), and written words are associated with later stages of speech perception (according to connectionist models).


The team sought out to directly compare these two types of visual cues and determine if they impact word learning in the same way.

They designed a study using minimal pairs of English pseudo-words, which were associated with unknown objects. The participants were native French speakers. They learned to associate each pseudo-word with an object using one of three teaching styles: auditory only, auditory with visual articulatory gesture, or auditory with written word.


The training included passive exposure to word-object associations and active training, where participants heard a word and had to identify the correct object from the minimal pair. After training, they completed a test involving discrimination and picture-word matching tasks. They were tested immediately after training and one day later.

Results showed that each training method had a similar impact on task performance, where there was no benefit from audiovisual presentation in the immediate posttest. However, one day later, auditory-only performance declined, auditory-orthographic performance increased, and auditory-articulatory remained stable.


Interestingly, seeing the written word with the auditory presentation had the strongest residual effects on learning. You may have heard that actions speak louder than words, but in the case of speech perception, words speak louder than actions.

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 
 

  4300 Duraform Lane • Windsor, Wisconsin 53598 USA
Phone: +1 608-443-2472 • Fax: +1 608-333-0310 • Email: info@psychonomic.org

Use of Articles
Legal Notice

Privacy Policy